Rebuilding Syria – Without Syria’s Oil – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

Rebuilding Syria – Without Syria’s Oil – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization
— Weiterlesen www.globalresearch.ca/rebuilding-syria-without-syria-oil/5693690

Nafeez AHMED: Die NATO beherbergt den Islamischen Staat …; Insurge Intelligence, 21.11.2015 – dt. Übers.

globalcrisis/globalchange NEWS

Martin Zeis, 25.11.2015

Aufgrund einiger Nachfragen aus den gc-Listen, ob es eine deutsche Übersetzung des gestern geposteten Textes von Nafeez AHMED „NATO is harbouring the Islamic State …“ gebe, reiche ich hier eine solche (z.T. von mir sprachlich überarbeitet) weiter. Der Text zeigt faktengesättigt wesentliche Hintergründe, Motive + Interessen der Akteure im Syrien-Konflikt auf, u.a. den Konflikt Türkei – Russland (siehe die gestrigen Ereignisse).

zum Rechercheablauf:
Unter dem Link http://www.mmnews.de/index.php/politik/59090-isis-turkei-gefahr ist heute eine Übersetzung des o.a. Textes von Nafeez AHMED ins Deutsche (mit verfälschtem Titel und gekürzt) von einem Anonymus „FritztheCat“ zu finden. Dieser Anonymus schrieb am 21.11.2015: „Ziemlich langer Artikel, obwohl ich ihn etwas gekürzt habe. Aber in der zweiten Hälfte wird endlich sehr gut das Energiespiel sichtbar. Und das miese Spiel der Türkei (der Tanz mit dem Teufel). Hoch interessant! Mit vielen Links (bis jetzt nur im Original, aber wir haben ja Dok:) Viel Spaß!
Quelle: https://propagandamelder.wordpress.com/2015/11/21/propagandameldungen-vom-21-november-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-39318

Die englische Originalfassung und die deutsche Übersetzung sind in dem beigefügten Dokument (pdf, 22 S.) verfügbar (dt. Übersetzung ab S. 11).

Grüße,
Martin Zeis

Die NATO beherbergt den Islamischen Staat
Warum Frankreichs beherzter neuer Krieg gegen ISIS ein schlechter Witz ist und eine Beleidigung für die Opfer der Anschläge in Paris. – Über Staatsterrorismus und den Pipelinekrieg –
by Nafeez Ahmed19.11.2015
Übersetzung: FritztheCat

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed (1978) ist ein britischer Autor, Journalist, und Referent für internationale Sicherheit. Er ist Geschäftsführender Direktor des Instituts für Politikforschung und Entwicklung (IPRD), einem unabhängigen Think-Tank für die Untersuchung von gewalttätigen Konflikten im Zusammenhang mit der globalen Umwelt-, Energie- und Wirtschaftskrise; ein Filmemacher, der “The Crisis of Civilization” co-produziert und geschrieben und “Grasp the Nettle” co-produziert hat – beide Filme wurden von Dean Puckett gedreht. Seine wissenschaftliche Arbeit fokussiert auf die systemischen Ursachen der Massengewalt. Er hat am Fachbereich für Internationale Beziehungen der University of Sussex und am Fachbereich Politik und Geschichte der Brunel University Undergraduate- und Postgraduate-Kurse für Theorie der internationalen Beziehungen, Zeitgeschichte, Imperialismus und Globalisierung gelehrt. Er ist ein ehemaliger Umwelt-Blogger für The Guardian. Ahmed hat eine wöchentliche Kolumne im Middle East Eye, einem in London ansässigen Nachrichtenportal des Ex-Guardian Leitartiklers David Hearst und ist ‘System Shift’-Kolumnist für VICE’s Motherboard. Ahmed ist Gründer und Herausgeber von Insurge Intelligence, eines crowdfinanzierten, investigativen Journalismus-Projekts.

(…)

AHMED_Nafeez-NATO-harbouring-ISIS-engl-dt151121.pdf

Prof. Michel CHOSSUDOVSKY: “Going After” the Islamic State. Guess Who is Behind the Caliphate Project? – Nov 17, 2015

“Going After” the Islamic State. Guess Who is Behind the Caliphate Project?

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, November 17, 2015

URL: http://www.globalresearch.ca/going-after-the-islamic-state/5401439

Author’s note and Update

The following article was first published in September 2014 at the outset of the air campaign “against the ISIS”. In recent developments Russia has officially joined the campaign against the Islamic State (ISIS). What are the implications?

Amply documented but rarely mentioned in news reports, the ISIS is a creation of US intelligence, recruited, trained and financed by the US and its allies including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Israel and Jordan.

What this means is that the ISIS terrorists are the foot soldiers of the Western alliance. While America claims to be targeting the ISIS, in reality it is protecting the ISIS. The air campaign is intent upon destroying Syria and Iraq rather than “going after the terrorists”.

But now Russia is involved in the campaign against the ISIS in coordination with the Syrian and Iraqi governments.

What does that mean? The official story is that Russia supports America’s resolve to fight the terrorists. It’s all for a good cause.

In reality, however, Russia is (indirectly) fighting America by supporting the actions of the Syrian and Iraqi governments against the ISIS terrorists, who happen to be the foot soldiers of the Western military alliance, with Western mercenaries and military advisers within their ranks.

The forbidden truth is that by providing military aid to both Syria and Iraq, Russia is (indirectly) confronting America. Moscow will be supporting both countries in their proxy war against the ISIL which is supported by the US and its allies.

Michel Chossudovsky, September 30, 2015

(…)

CHOSSUDOVSKY-Who’s-Behind-The-Caliphate-Project151117.pdf

Interview von weltnetz.tv mit Elizabeth Murray und Ray McGovern

Veröffentlicht am 24.09.2015

Interview von weltnetz.tv mit Elizabeth Murray (ehemalige Offizierin im National Inteligence Council) und Ray McGovern (ehemaliger CIA-Analyst und Russlandspezialist) über Whistleblower, den Einfluss von Geheimdiensten auf politische Entscheidungen und Drohnenkriege.

Mid-East-geopolitics — Endgame: Putin Plans To Strike ISIS With Or Without The U.S.; zerohedge/Bloomberg Sep 23, 2015

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-23/endgame-putin-bomb-isis-or-without-obama

Endgame: Putin Plans To Strike ISIS With Or Without The U.S.

… As Bloomberg reports*, The Kremlin is prepared to launch unilateral strikes against ISIS targets if the US is unwilling to cooperate. Here’s more:

President Vladimir Putin, determined to strengthen Russia’s only military outpost in the Middle East, is preparing to launch unilateral airstrikes against Islamic State from inside Syria if the U.S. rejects his proposal to join forces, two people familiar with the matter said.
Putin’s preferred course of action, though, is for America and its allies to agree to coordinate their campaign against the terrorist group with Russia, Iran and the Syrian army, which the Obama administration has so far resisted, according to a person close to the Kremlin and an adviser to the Defense Ministry in Moscow.
Russian diplomacy has shifted into overdrive as Putin seeks to avoid the collapse of the embattled regime of Bashar al-Assad, a longtime ally who’s fighting both a 4 1/2 year civil war and Sunni extremists under the banner of Islamic State. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu flew to Moscow for talks with Putin on Monday, followed by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Tuesday.
Putin’s proposal, which Russia has communicated to the U.S., calls for a “parallel track” of joint military action accompanied by a political transition away from Assad, a key U.S. demand, according to a third person. The initiative will be the centerpiece of Putin’s one-day trip to New York for the United Nations General Assembly on Sept. 28, which may include talks with President Barack Obama.
“Russia is hoping common sense will prevail and Obama takes Putin’s outstretched hand,” said Elena Suponina, a senior Middle East analyst at the Institute of Strategic Studies, which advises the Kremlin. “But Putin will act anyway if this doesn’t happen.”

And that, as they say, it that. Checkmate. (…)Second, even if Russia does agree to some manner of managed transition away from Assad, you can be absolutely sure that Moscow is not going to risk the lives of its soldiers (not to mention its international reputation) only to have the US dictate what Syria’s new government looks like and indeed, Tehran will have absolutely nothing of a regime that doesn’t perpetuate the existing Mid-East balance of power which depends upon Syria not falling to the West. Additionally – and this is also critical – Russia will of course be keen on ensuring that whoever comes after Assad looks after Russia’s interests at its naval base at Tartus. (…)“ — emphasis, zerohedge —

* http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-23/putin-said-to-plan-islamic-state-strikes-with-or-without-u-s-

Pepe ESCOBAR: US Fears Russian Syria Peace Plan Not Russian Intervention; RI Sep 10, 2015

RI, 10.09.2015 http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/us-fears-russian-syria-peace-plan-not-russian-intervention/ri9642

US Fears Russian Syria Peace Plan Not Russian Intervention
US isn’t worried about Russian military action in Syria. It’s worried about a Russian initiative that would see power sharing in Syria and a joint front against ISIS and Al Qaeda in the region
By Pepe ESCOBAR

The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming! Well, the Russians are always coming. The Russians never stopped coming since those heady Cold War days. The Russians are “invading” Ukraine. Every day. For over a year now. Now the Russians are “invading” Syria.

That’s just a prelude. Soon the Russians will be invading the whole Middle East, the whole of Eastern and Western Europe, the whole Arctic. And then, one day, surreptitiously, they will be back in Cuba, ready to invade Florida and then the whole homeland.

History now repeats itself under the eternal recurrence of farce. About the best illustration of the propaganda modus operandi underlying the current exceptionalist hysteria over Russia’s alleged “military incursion” in Syria was penned way back in 2011 on Counterpunch by the late, great Alex Cockburn. Enjoy:

“Suppose the CIA leaks a national security review concluding that the moon is actually made of cheese, and the Chinese are planning to send up a pair of gigantic bio-engineered rats to breed in numbers sufficient to eat the cheese and thus sabotage US plans for Missile Defense radar deployment on the moon’s dark side.
The headlines will initially proclaim, “Doubts on Chinese Rat Threat Widespread. Many scoff.” The lead paragraph in news stories in the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal will quote the scoffers, but then ‘balance’ will mandate respectful quotation from ‘intelligence sources’, faculty professors, think tank ‘experts’ and the like, all eager to dance to the government’s tune: Many say rat scenario ‘plausible’, etc.
Lo and behold, by the end of a couple of days of such news stories, the Chinese rat plot is firmly ensconced as a credible proposition. News reports then turn to respectful discussion of the US government’s options in confronting and routing the Chinese rat threat: Vice President says ‘all options are on the table,’ etc.”

There you go. China – as well as Russia – are of course major threats, according to the Pentagon’s military doctrine; as bad if not worse than ISIS/ISIL/Daesh. So Russia must have a rat threat of its own. Which brings us to the “The Russians are Coming” Syria plot, which has submerged think tanks such as the CIA front Stratfor in profoundly thoughtful speculation, everything of course based on prime, second-hand, ideologically-corrupted, lousy – and fake – intel.

That power-sharing dilemma

(…)

ESCOBAR-US-fears-Russia’s-Peace-Plan150910.pdf

Hat Washington sich gerade selbst in den öligen Fuß geschossen? | The Vineyard Saker – Deutsche Version

Hat Washington sich gerade selbst in den öligen Fuß geschossen? | The Vineyard Saker – Deutsche Version.

Der Autor F. William Engdahl ist Berater und Dozent für strategische Risiken; er hat Politik-Diplom der Princeton Universität und ist Bestseller-Autor über Öl und Geopolitik exklusiv für das Magazin “New Eastern Outlook”.