In einer kürzlich von den Vereinten Nationen abgegebenen Erklärung unterstützten 54 Länder Chinas Hongkong-Politik, während 39 in einem …Welche Länder unterstützen China in Bezug auf das nationale Sicherheitsgesetz für Hongkong?
Escobar: For China, Everything Is Proceeding According To Plan
by Tyler DurdenWed, 08/26/2020
The contours of China’s long-term strategy for the new Cold War are quickly coming into view…
Let’s start with the story of an incredibly disappearing summit.nullChina, U.S. Expected to Restart Trade Talks
Every August, the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) converges to the town of Beidaihe, a seaside resort some two hours away from Beijing, to discuss serious policies that then coalesce into key planning strategies to be approved at the CCP Central Committee plenary session in October. (…)
Das jüngste Friedensabkommen zwischen Jerusalem und Abu Dhabi zielt offenbar darauf ab, eine „arabische NATO“ gegen den Iran, aber eigentlich gegen China zu gründen. Sie soll aus den Golfstaaten und mit Unterstützung der USA, Israels und der NATO Chinas Pläne zur Neuen Seidenstraße vereiteln. Wenn das gelingen sollte, wäre das ein harter Schlag gegen das Reich der Mitte.
Der Hafen von Beirut sollte aus chinesischer Sicht eine wichtige Rolle beim Aufbau der Neuen Seidenstraße und beim Handel mit Europa spielen. Doch die Zerstörung des Hafens hat alle Träume zunichte gemacht. Ein schwerer Schlag gegen China und Europa.
Post-blast Lebanon has everything to gain from rejecting the West’s neoliberal demands and embracing China’s Belt and Road…
As much as Covid-19 has been instrumentalized by the 0.001% to social engineer a Great Reset, the Beirut tragedy is already being instrumentalized by the usual suspects to keep Lebanon enslaved.
Facing oh so timely color revolution-style “protests”, the current Lebanese government led by Prime Minister Diab has already resigned. Even before the port tragedy, Beirut had requested a $10 billion line of credit from the IMF – denied as long as trademark, neoliberal Washington consensus “reforms” were not implemented: radical slashing of public expenses, mass layoffs, across the board privatization.
MANILA – In a clear and well-orchestrated escalation, the US State Department has effectively rejected nearly all of China’s claims and activities in the
— Weiterlesen asiatimes.com/2020/07/us-picks-a-fight-with-china-in-south-china-sea/
Quelle: Die ewige Gelbe Gefahr
Putin’s Call For A New System & The 1944 Battle Of Bretton Woods: Lessons For Victory Day
As today’s world teeters on the brink of a financial collapse greater than anything the world experienced in either 1923 Weimar or the 1929 Great depression, a serious discussion has been initiated by leaders of Russia and China regarding the terms of the new system which must inevitably replace the currently dying neo-liberal order. Most recently, Vladimir Putin re-initiated his January 16, 2020 call for a new emergency economic conference to deal with the looming disaster based upon a live session with representatives of the five nuclear powers of the UN Security Council.
This new system as we have seen promoted by the likes of the Bank of England and leading technocrats over the past year, is based upon an anti-Nation State, unipolar system which typically goes by the term “Green New Deal”. In other words, this is a system ruled by a technocratic elite managing the reduction of world population through the monetization of carbon reduction practices under a Global Government.
No matter how you look at it, a new system will be created out of the ashes of the currently dying world order. The question is only: Will it benefit the oligarchy or the people?
In order to inform the necessary decision making going into this emergency conference, it is useful to revisit the last such emergency conference that defined the terms of a world economic architecture in July 1944 so that similar mistakes that were then made by anti-imperialist forces are not made once more. (…)
‚No Evidence Coronavirus Was Made in a Chinese Lab‘ Fauci Says
May 05, 2020 „Information Clearing House“ – Trump insists that his administration has evidence that the virus was created in Wuhan city.
The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci Monday reiterated that there is no scientific evidence to claim that the SARS-CoV coronavirus was created in a laboratory. His statement contradicts again the theory on the origin of COVID-19 defended by the U.S. President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
„If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats and what’s out there now, [the scientific evidence] is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated,“ Fauci said in an interview with National Geographic
„Everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that [this virus] evolved in nature and then jumped species,“ the U.S. government’s leading epidemiologist added.
His statements are in line with those set forth by the World Health Organization (WHO), a United Nations agency that ratified on Monday that the coronavirus is of animal origin. „The coronavirus circulates ancestrally between bats. (…)
Der Westen sei «arrogant, ignorant und besserwisserisch», sagt Chinakenner und Herzchirurg Professor Paul Robert Vogt.