Dmitri TRENIN: West’s antics pushing Russia closer to China; China Daily, Sept. 12, 2014

Von: „Martin Zeis“ <Martin.zeis>
Datum: 12. September 2014 19:12:09 MESZ
An: gc-special-engl%Martin.zeis
Betreff: Dmitri TRENIN: West’s antics pushing Russia closer to China; China Daily, Sept. 12, 2014

– print-version (pdf-file- attached / emphasis zerohedge, m.z. –

West’s antics pushing Russia closer to China
Updated: 2014-09-12 – 07:34
By Dmitri Trenin(China Daily)

The recent NATO summit in Wales, held against the background of the armed conflict in Ukraine, has brought back the Cold War atmosphere to Europe. NATO’s partnership with Russia remains formally suspended. In fact, NATO is treating Russia more as an adversary than a partner.
The alliance is setting up a „Rapid Reaction Force“ to deal with emergencies on Europe’s eastern flank. The alliance’s military infrastructure is moving toward that exposed flank, and closer to Russia’s borders. NATO forces will now spend more time exercising in the east, and their presence there will visibly grow. NATO-leaning Ukraine, which the alliance alleges is an object of „Russian aggression“, has been promised financial and military support.

The Ukraine crisis is not just about Eastern Europe, it is also about the world order. The Kremlin is seeking Washington’s recognition of what it regards as its core national security interest: keeping Ukraine as a buffer zone between Russia and the West, particularly NATO. Washington, on principle, denies Moscow this „imperial privilege“, and insists on the freedom of all countries, including Ukraine, to choose alliances and affiliations.

The stakes are high. Should Russia be rolled back in Ukraine, not only will its international position materially suffer, but also the power of the Kremlin inside the country might be dangerously undermined. On the other hand, if the US were to eventually accept Russia’s demand for a „zone of comfort“ along its borders, Washington’s credibility as the global dominant power, the norm-setter and arbiter will suffer.
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, of course, is no military alliance, and even less a rival of NATO. Its member states, however, are closely watching the US-Russian match being played out at the western end on the great Eurasian continent. Some, like the Central Asian states, are essentially ducking, hedging, or running for cover. China, which seeks to defend its own core interests in East Asia and the Western Pacific, looks at the current Russian-American competition through the prism of its own relations with Washington and Moscow.
China has a very important relationship to keep with the US. Playing a long game, Beijing usually avoids direct collisions with Washington, and means to profit from the US-initiated globalization to the fullest extent possible. Like Russia, however, China would also want to carve out a comfort zone for itself along its eastern borders and shores, and, like Russia again, it faces the reality of the US‘ physical presence and US-led alliances there. What Washington is now doing in an effort to contain Moscow in Eastern Europe provides important information to Beijing in East Asia.

There is more to Beijing’s reaction than just watching and drawing conclusions. The apparently long-term rupture of Russia’s relations with the West offers an opportunity to the Chinese leadership to enhance its already close relationship with the Kremlin and thus turn the global geopolitical balance in its favor – not unlike former US president Richard Nixon and former secretary of state Henry Kissinger who reached out to Chairman Mao Zedong in 1972. The Russians, angry with Washington, are now more amenable to giving China wider access to their energy riches and their advanced military technology. The Western sanctions pushing Russia out of the international financial system are also making Moscow more ready and willing to back the Chinese yuan against the US dollar.

A Sino-Russian military alliance against the US is still a rather long shot. Yet the two countries‘ political, economic and military alignment is getting thicker. An expellee from the G8, which is now back to G7, Russia is now eagerly embracing the non-West, particularly in Asia and Latin America. Within the non-West, China is unquestionably the premier power. Managing Russia will not be easy for anyone, but the country is a precious resource for China. So far, Beijing has displayed more tact in dealing with Moscow than any other major player in the world. Building on this success, it can now set its bar higher.

To a China which is rising and raising its global profile, BRICS is an asymmetrical equivalent of the G7, albeit in a very different shape and form. The SCO, to use a similar analogy, is an asymmetrical analogue to NATO, but as a political organization of continental Asia (including Russia), rather than a military bloc. The inclusion of India and Pakistan into the SCO is a logical next step. Iran, currently an observer, can follow later. Turkey, an SCO dialogue partner and a member of NATO, can become a useful link to the North Atlantic alliance.
Enhancing the SCO’s security credentials and extending its reach requires a major qualitative upgrade of China’s strategic thinking and diplomacy, and an even closer partnership with Russia. The SCO summit in Dushanbe, Tajikistan, will probably not see this yet, but it might become a point when the balance of Eurasia has decisively turned in China’s favor. Beijing would need to thank Washington for it.


WG: woher die Waffen der ISIS stammen

Von Willy Wahl dokumentiert eine Untersuchung, woher die Waffen der ISIS stammen:

Der US-Publizist Kurt Nimmo untersucht, wie der ISIS zu seinen schweren Waffen kam
und wer ihn weshalb so stark gemacht hat.

Anfang der weitergeleiteten E‑Mail:

Von: „Willy Wahl“ <willy.wahl>
Datum: 12. September 2014 15:08:08 MESZ
An: „Willy Wahl“ <willy.wahl>
Betreff: WG: woher die Waffen der ISIS stammen


Ex-CIA-Offizier McGovern „Der Putsch in Kiew stand am Anfang“ –

Hallo zusammen,

der ehemalige US-Geheimdienstler und Mitglied der VIPS (Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity) wurde von und vom Hintergrund zum Unkraine-Konflikt interviewt.

Das 18-minütige Interview (englisch) sowie die deutsche Übersetzung sind abrufbar unter:


Ukraine-Konflikt: „Der Putsch in Kiew stand am Anfang“

Raymond McGovern, ehemaliger CIA-Offizier und Russland-Spezialist, im Gespräch mit

Während im Osten der Ukraine ein heißer Krieg mit schon weit über 2.000 Todesopfern läuft, findet in den westlichen Staaten ein Kampf um die öffentliche Meinung statt. Regierungen, Geheimdienste und Medienkonzerne machen massiv Stimmung gegen Russland. Zwar verfolgt auch Moskau in der Ukraine ohne Zweifel seine eigene Interessenpolitik. Aber ist die Regierung von Präsident Wladimir Putin für die Krise verantwortlich? Welche Rolle spielt die NATO? Und ist angeblichen Beweisfotos über russische Truppen zu trauen? sprach mit dem ehemaligen CIA-Offizier Raymond McGovern. Der gebürtige New Yorker war fast drei Jahrzehnte lang für die morgendliche Berichterstattung im Weißen Haus zuständig. Er diente insgesamt sieben US-Präsidenten. Aus Kritik gegen den Angriffskrieg der USA gegen Irak gründete er 2003 mit anderen ehemaligen CIA-Mitarbeitern die Organisation  Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), die eine alternative Analyse geopolitischer Konflikte liefert. McGovern gehört auch zu den Unterzeichnern eines offenen Briefes an die deutscheBundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel, in dem ehemalige US-Geheimdienstler die CDU-Politikerin vor gefälschten Beweisen gegen Russland warnen. Harald Neuber traf Raymond McGovern am Rande einer Veranstaltung im „Sprechsaal“ in Berlin zu einem kurzen Gespräch.

Für das Transkript in deutscher Übersetzung bitte auf „mehr“ klicken (siehe unten).

Wortlaut des Briefes von VIPS nachzulesen unter:


„Wir haben keine freie Presse mehr“

Über Medienlügen, den Ukraine-Konflikt und den Abschuss von MH17 -Interview mit RAY McGOVERN, 9. September 2014 -…

Viele Grüße

Elke Schenk